I remember roughly ten years ago, when a friend came by and upon attaching his hdd to my machine a nice Afterstep desktop booted up. It was in the Windows 95-98 era, where one couldn’t boot a Windows OS with a different motherboard (actually XP still sucks with this), so I really thought it was astonishing. Things “worked” – for some reason Linux was “stability”. Linux: as a server and, to be honest, as a very weak desktop – but even with the guy doing nearly everything on the command line, the lack of blue screens struck me.
Nowdays all I hear is that the desktop Linux is here (X is the year of the Linux desktop, where X is the current year) – and actually I just don’t think so. By forcing this very strong server system to behave like a desktop, it’s just loosing quality. Hard lockups, bad drivers, the stupid rants and quarrels about the binary blobs and all the brokan applications – it’s not what I saw a decade ago.
Just for fun, search for the word “segfault” on some of the Linux distributions I used and liked (number of results): Arch ~322, Ubuntu 250, Gentoo 183.
Debian community is so terrible, there’s not much point in using their forums in my opinion – what’s important is not these numbers, but the fact that others are experiencing these issues as well. I don’t care if it is an nvidia driver, a udev issue, a broken browser or whatnot, segfaults, lockups and the Magic SysRequest Bicycle Repairmen are all here to stay.